Shakkei incorporates scenery outside a garden—mountains, woodland or buildings—into its composition. Nearby pools, stones, hedges and architectural openings guide the view towards it and screen unwanted elements. The distant mountain remains outside the grounds, while becoming part of the scene composed with the garden.
IN 30 SECONDS
Shakkei: composing a garden with scenery beyond it
借景(しゃっけい)
The deliberate incorporation of scenery beyond a garden into its composition, using viewpoints, foreground elements and screening to relate inside and outside.
Relations: viewpoint, foreground and outside scenery
Scale: temple gardens and expansive villas
Care: pruning and protecting views beyond the grounds
How scenery enters the composition
An outside view within a garden composition
Viewpoint
Where the view is taken
Foreground and screening
How water, stones, hedges and openings organise the view
Scenery beyond
Mountains, woodland or buildings remain outside the garden
Where the viewer stands matters
Room or veranda
An opening frames what can be seen
Paths and stepping stones
Moving alters the overlap of nearby screens and distant scenery
Murin-an’s managers suggest looking for viewing clues before an alcove or at a large stepping stone.
The same garden looks different from a room, veranda or path. At Murin-an, its managers identify places such as the position before an alcove or a large stepping stone as clues to viewing arrangements. Moving changes how openings, trees and foreground elements overlap, and therefore how much of the outside scenery is revealed.
Entsū-ji: pillars and hedge corners set different lines
Through the innermost left and right pillars
- Look towards Hiei from the designated point
- Lines through the two pillars → sides of the viewing corridor
Through the hedge’s north and south corners
- Start from the same designated point
- Lines through the hedge corners → directions of the near- and distant-view design zones
The pillars and hedge corners establish different extents. This is a conservation-area map, not an internal garden floor plan.
Kyoto designates a point within Entsū-ji’s Miyuki Goten as the viewpoint. Towards Hiei, the innermost left and right pillars delimit the protected viewing corridor. Lines from that same point through the hedge’s north and south corners define the directions of the near- and distant-view design zones. The room opening and garden edge therefore frame different extents. Moving elsewhere would alter their overlap with the mountain; the arrangement depends on a particular position.
Gardens and the history of the term
Medieval Tenryū-ji: pond and mountains
- Fourteenth century
Features of Musō Soseki’s garden survive
- 1799
Miyako Rinsen Meishō Zue records features of the layout
The temple now describes the pond-and-mountain relationship as borrowed scenery; this does not establish Musō’s own use of the term.
Tenryū-ji’s Sōgenchi garden retains features of the garden made by Musō Soseki in the fourteenth century. Centred on a pond, it incorporates Arashiyama and Kameyama into the view. From the abbot’s hall, pond-side stones and trees lead into the mountain backdrop. The temple also notes that its overall appearance preserves features recorded in the illustrated Miyako Rinsen Meishō Zue of 1799. The temple’s present description calls this borrowed scenery; it does not establish that Musō himself used that term.
Edo gardens: a mountain beyond the hedge
A concentrated garden-and-mountain view
Low hedge, stones in a level garden and mountain beyond
An expansive villa landscape
Built around 1656–1659; gardens and buildings at different levels linked by pine-lined routes
At Entsū-ji’s Edo-period garden, a low hedge links the stone-set level garden to Mount Hiei beyond. At Shugakuin Imperial Villa, built around 1656–1659, gardens and buildings occupy different levels, connected by pine-lined routes across rice fields; surrounding mountains form part of their backdrop. These examples work at different viewing scales, from a concentrated garden-and-mountain scene to an expansive villa landscape.
A practice and a term have different histories
Circulation of the term
- The term occurs in Song-period writing
- A chapter in the Ming treatise Yuanye
- Poetry and garden books carry it to Japan
Garden composition and later discussion
Actual viewing arrangements have their own history. Discussion and research on shakkei in Japan grow from the nineteenth century onwards.
The dates of garden examples and the circulation of a name are separate questions.
The term has Chinese roots: it occurs in Song-period writing and receives a chapter in the Ming garden treatise Yuanye. Poetry and garden books carried it to Japan. The history of composing actual garden views does not follow the same timeline as the circulation of the word. Discussion and study of borrowed scenery in Japanese gardens increased from the nineteenth century onwards.
Murin-an: Higashiyama, lawn and running water
Direction and garden making
Yamagata Aritomo → seventh-generation Ogawa Jihei
Within the garden
Lawn and running water supplied by the Lake Biwa Canal
Backdrop beyond
Higashiyama anchors the composition
- 1894–1896
Murin-an developed
- 1951
Designated a national Place of Scenic Beauty
Murin-an was developed in 1894–1896 under Yamagata Aritomo’s direction, with its garden made by the seventh-generation Ogawa Jihei. Higashiyama anchors the composition, beyond open lawn and running water supplied by the Lake Biwa Canal. Here borrowed scenery works with the open space and moving water of a modern villa garden. The garden was designated a national Place of Scenic Beauty in 1951.
Growth, care and view conservation
Growth can hide a borrowed view
- 1935
Shōden-ji: Shigemori Mirei directs work including removal of unnecessary trees to restore the Hiei view
Care involves both the outline and light reaching inner branches. The next example shows why the work needs to be sequenced.
Borrowed views depend on continuing horticultural work. After a period of reduced care following the Meiji Restoration, overgrown trees at Shōden-ji obstructed Mount Hiei. In 1935, Shigemori Mirei directed work including the removal of unnecessary trees to restore the earlier view. Pruning has to preserve the outline while thinning branches so light reaches the interior; otherwise inner branches die and only an outer layer of leaves remains. This continuing care sustains the relationship between foreground and mountain.
Murin-an: admitting light before lowering the screen
Figure 2 in the 2015 care report: restoration under the approach introduced in 2007
These are the report’s explanatory diagrams, retaining their Japanese text, rather than three photographs. Thinning and lowering selected inner growth work together to reveal Higashiyama and screen distractions.
Open the original care figure at its original width
A 2015 maintenance report describes how trees around Murin-an had been kept tall to conceal surrounding development. Dense upper growth then shaded out lower branches, allowing outside structures to show through. Restoration under the management approach introduced in 2007 first thinned upper branches to admit light and encourage middle growth. Staff then lowered inner shrubs and small trees previously kept tall as screens. The sequence revealed Higashiyama while retaining foliage that concealed outside distractions. Maintaining a borrowed view did not mean cutting every obstructing tree down low.
Protecting a view extends beyond the garden
Inside the grounds
Care for the foreground shaped by hedges, stones, trees and openings
Beyond the grounds
Building heights, roofs and colours also affect the view
Entsū-ji’s zones use a designated viewpoint. Gardens including the Adachi Museum of Art also continue to compose their grounds with natural mountains.
Buildings and land-use changes outside the grounds can also alter borrowed scenery. Kyoto defines a protected viewing area from Entsū-ji’s Miyuki Goten towards Mount Hiei, with standards covering building height, roofs and colours. Conservation therefore extends to the space seen from a particular position. Gardens such as those at the Adachi Museum of Art continue to compose their grounds in relation to natural mountain scenery.
Height, roof form and colour do different work
Viewing corridor
Every part of a building normally stays at or below an elevation of 110.2 metres, with permitted exceptions
Near-view design zone
Roof form, materials, colour and other design standards
Distant-view design zone
Exterior and roof colours in relation to the mountains
110.2 metres is elevation above sea level, not building height above the ground.
Within the viewing corridor
New construction or an increase in elevation → certification application
Within the near-view zone
Work changing appearance normally → notification; some review is handled through other landscape procedures
Open the official page with its legend and standards
Entsū-ji’s protected viewing corridor normally limits every part of a building to an elevation of 110.2 metres, with permitted exceptions. This is elevation above sea level, not building height above the ground. The near-view zone also regulates roof form, materials and colour; the distant-view zone focuses on exterior and roof colours in relation to the mountains. Kyoto distinguishes the procedures: new construction or increases in elevation within the viewing corridor require certification, while work changing appearances in the near-view zone normally requires notification. Some design-zone notifications can be handled within other landscape procedures. Conservation consequently also reaches development outside the garden.
What can you now explain?
Does any view of a distant mountain count as shakkei?
Not necessarily. Shakkei concerns how outside scenery is composed with a garden’s foreground, viewpoints and screening.
Can only mountains be borrowed?
No. Woodland and buildings can also be incorporated, though mountains appear in many well-known Japanese examples.
Is shakkei limited to dry gardens?
No. Pond gardens such as Tenryū-ji, the Shugakuin villa landscape and Murin-an’s lawn-and-stream garden also incorporate scenery beyond their grounds.
Should every boundary tree be cut low if it hides the mountain?
No. At Murin-an, upper thinning encouraged middle growth before selected inner shrubs and small trees were lowered. Foliage still screened outside development. Revealing the mountain and concealing distractions had to be considered together.
Sources and further reading
- 借景|Wikipedia(日文知识面)
- Borrowed scenery|Wikipedia(English coverage)
- 园冶|Wikipedia(中文相邻范围)
- 曹源池庭園|天龍寺 境内・山内案内
- 円通寺庭園|文化遺産データベース
- 修学院離宮施設案内|宮内庁
- 無鄰菴とは|指定管理者植彌加藤造園
- 京都の庭園文化3|菅沼裕・京都市文化観光資源保護財団
- 無鄰菴|京都市内博物館施設連絡協議会
- 眺望景観創生条例 基準案内|京都市
- 日本庭園|足立美術館
- 京の景観ガイドライン眺望景観編 庭園からの眺め|京都市
- 名勝無鄰菴庭園の年間維持管理・印99–101頁|阪上富男・加藤友規、2015
- 円通寺・視点場と保全区域の範囲及び基準|京都市
- 眺望景観保全地域(近景・遠景・空間)の場合|京都市、2026年4月6日