Juken means taking an examination. In discussions of school entry, it also evokes choosing schools, preparation, applications and waiting for results. Admissions selection decides who may enter a school; it is different from an examination for completing a course. Arrangements vary by educational stage and institution.
IN 30 SECONDS
Entrance exams: schools, study and families
受験・入学者選抜
Admissions in Japan connect schools’ selection methods with students’ study, school choices and household arrangements. Subject tests are one common method; records, interviews, essays and recommendations may also contribute. Experiences differ by educational stage and route.
Ordinary municipal junior-high entry follows school assignment
High-school and university arrangements vary
Preparation can include books, mocks and juku
School stages and selection combinations
More than a test paper
Admissions selection
Decides who can enter a school
Graduation examination
Concerns completion of a course
Discussion of juken often connects these experiences; arrangements vary by educational stage and institution.
Not every child sits a junior-high entrance exam
Ordinary municipal junior high
School assignment by the education board
Other choices
National, private and public integrated schools
Each has an admissions process
Tokyo public integrated schools, 2027 general places: one example
Primary-school report + appropriate assessments specified by the school
The rule against academic tests at public integrated schools does not mean automatic entry; schools do not all use every assessment listed.
Ordinary municipal junior-high entry follows school assignment by the education board, rather than a competitive entrance test for everyone. Families may instead seek national, private or public integrated secondary schools, which make their own admissions decisions. The rule against academic tests at public integrated schools does not mean automatic entry for every applicant. For Tokyo’s general places in the 2027 intake, primary-school reports are combined with an appropriate selection of aptitude assessments, interviews, essays or practical assessments; each school specifies the combination.
High school: tests and school records
Kanagawa’s system published in 2026: the general full-time pattern
Subject examinations
Chōsasho
A school report recording achievement and other information
Some schools add interviews or practical assessments. This is a dated regional example rather than a nationwide checklist.
High-school selection can combine subject tests with junior-high records. Details are regional. Kanagawa’s system published in 2026 generally uses Japanese, social studies, mathematics, science and English for full-time schools, together with a chōsasho, the school report recording achievement and other information. Some schools add interviews or practical assessments.
Several university admissions routes
General selection
Subject tests, essays and other assessments
Comprehensive selection
Detailed documents and interviews
School recommendation
Based on a principal’s recommendation and school records
Comprehensive and recommendation routes may also use the Common Test, oral examinations or inquiry work; they do not simply bypass academic assessment.
University routes include general selection, comprehensive selection and school-recommendation selection. General selection emphasises tests or essays; comprehensive selection combines detailed documents and interviews; school recommendation begins with a principal’s recommendation and school records. The University of Osaka explains that its comprehensive and recommendation routes can also use the Common Test, oral examinations and inquiry activities.
The Common Test is one component
Common Test results
A shared examination administered by the National Center
Institution, faculty and route rules
Specify which subjects and evidence to use
Additional assessments
Institutional examinations, interviews or other requirements
Shared results enter different selection combinations, rather than creating a single admissions cutoff for every university.
The National Center for University Entrance Examinations administers the Common Test for universities that use its results. Universities may also set their own examinations, interviews or other requirements. Even within one university, required subjects and documents can differ by faculty and route. There is no single admissions cutoff for all universities.
Combining evidence within one faculty
Osaka’s published 2027 Science Challenge route: Mathematics and Physics
- First stage: review the submitted documents
- Qualifiers take the second-stage essay and oral examinations
Common Test
1000 → 100
Original maximum → scaled maximum
Other evidence
100
The combined maximum for documents, essay and oral examination
A separate Common Test condition
Roughly eighty percent or higher; other evidence must still be assessed
The other 100 points are a combined allocation, not 100 for each item. Meeting the Common Test condition does not automatically produce an offer.
For the University of Osaka’s published 2027 Science Challenge route, covering Mathematics and Physics, documents determine the first-stage decision. Successful candidates take an essay examination and an oral examination. The final assessment combines these with Common Test results: its 1,000 points become 100, alongside 100 for documents, essay and oral examination together. Common Test performance must also be roughly eighty percent or higher. Meeting that condition leaves other evidence to be assessed.
Study materials and mock-exam feedback
Study beyond the classroom
Home study, correspondence or tutoring, and juku are different arrangements rather than a package every candidate must buy.
Preparation may involve books at home, correspondence courses or juku—private classes for supplementary study or entrance preparation. Japan’s education ministry’s learning-cost survey separates home study, correspondence or private tutoring, and juku expenditure. These are different arrangements, rather than a package required of every candidate.
Past papers and another attempt
Kako-mon: past questions
Kyōgakusha’s Akahon series · launched in 1954
Final school year
Apply while finishing school
Preparation after leaving school
Often called rōnin
This does not mean already enrolled at university
Kako-mon are past examination questions. Kyōgakusha’s university Akahon series, first published in 1954, collects such papers. Candidates may apply in their final school year or prepare again after leaving school. Those continuing full-time entrance preparation are often called rōnin; the term does not mean they are already university students.
Mock exams and hensachi
The candidate group in one mock examination
50Hensachi corresponding to the mean score
Mock-exam feedback
Learn the format and identify weaknesses
Eventual admission
Still depends on later study and the actual selection
Fifty is a standardised position within that test group, not fifty percent correct.
Mock exams provide practice and feedback. Hensachi is a standardised score locating a result within that test’s candidate group; the mean corresponds to fifty. Kawaijuku distinguishes a mock-exam prediction at one point in time from eventual admission. Later study and the actual selection process still matter.
Household costs, applications and arrangements
What a cost figure measures
Annual public junior-high juku expenditure, fiscal 2023 · corrected in 2026
Denominator: all pupils
About ¥230,000Includes pupils with no spending in this category
Denominator: pupils with such spending
About ¥349,000Includes only pupils with juku expenditure
These are averages for the same year with different denominators, rather than a before-and-after increase. The category includes fees, materials, in-juku mocks and travel, not total admissions costs.
In the education ministry’s fiscal-2023 survey, corrected in 2026, annual juku spending for public junior-high pupils averaged about ¥230,000 across all pupils, or ¥349,000 among those with such spending. The denominators differ. This category includes fees, materials, in-juku mock tests and travel; it is not the total cost of admission.
Dates, documents and payment
Steps on the official 2027 Common Test portal
- Create an account
- Enter registration details
- Pay: the application is complete
- Obtain the admission ticket later
Payment here completes the Common Test application; university applications and admission have separate procedures.
Applications have their own sequence. The official portal for the 2027 Common Test separates account creation, registration, payment and downloading the admission ticket; payment completes the application. Families may also arrange campus visits, books and mock-exam costs. Study plans therefore intersect with schedules and household budgets.
A test application is followed by a university application
The same Osaka 2027 Science Challenge example
Common Test side
- Complete the separate Common Test application
- Sit the Common Test; results feed the university’s final decision
University side
- Apply online, pay the examination fee and mail documents
- First-stage document review
- 20 December 2026: second-stage essay and oral examinations
- February 2027: the final decision combines Common Test results and other evidence
- Successful candidates enrol: register information, pay the matriculation fee or apply for remission, and submit documents
Separately register score-request information
The 4–22 December 2026 window overlaps other assessment stages
An assessment held before the Common Test is not an admission offer, and an offer does not automatically complete enrolment.
This route also requires Osaka’s online application, examination fee and mailed documents. First-stage qualifiers take the second assessment on the published date of 20 December 2026, and register the information allowing Osaka to request Common Test results. Assessment before the Common Test is not an admission offer: the final decision follows in February 2027. Successful candidates then complete enrolment, including information registration, the required fee payment or exemption application, and documents.
Different examination arrangements
The National College of Nursing’s 2026 notice: one institutional example
- Apply for the arrangements in advance
- The institution reviews the request
- The decision is communicated
A request is followed by review and notification; this is not a list automatically supplied by every institution.
Some candidates need arrangements such as specified seating, a hearing aid or a separate room. The National College of Nursing’s 2026 notice describes advance application, review and notification of the decision. This institution-specific example shows that preparation also includes making the assessment accessible.
Earlier selection and preparation media
Competition under the old system
- Meiji and Taishō
Competition at old-system higher schools leading to imperial universities
- 1927
Greater weight to prior school performance and personal assessment
- 1940
Stronger combined assessment of records, written and oral tests, and physical examinations
Old-system higher schools belonged to a different institutional structure from today’s senior high schools.
Meiji- and Taishō-era higher-education selection already relied heavily on subject examinations. Competition was particularly intense at the old-system higher schools leading to imperial universities, institutions unlike today’s senior high schools. In 1927 selection gave greater weight to prior school performance and personal assessment; a 1940 policy strengthened combined consideration of records, written and oral tests, and physical examinations.
Postwar reforms and preparation burdens
- Postwar
A nationwide aptitude test alongside academic examinations
- 1955
National administration ended from this admissions year
- 1960s
Debate over excessive preparation and concentration on popular schools prompted further changes
The 1955 change concerns national administration, rather than an end to every form of institutional aptitude assessment.
A postwar nationwide aptitude test sought to assess abilities alongside academic tests. Criticism of its reliability and the burden of preparing for both helped end nationally administered aptitude testing from the 1955 admissions year. As high-school attendance expanded, 1960s debates over excessive preparation and concentration on popular schools prompted further changes to records, subjects and selection methods.
Preparation through print and radio
Preparation developed its own media. Ōbunsha launched Juken Junpō in 1932, later renamed Keisetsu Jidai, and began university-preparation radio courses in 1952. The publisher aimed to deliver information and teaching to regional students. Books, correspondence and broadcasts extended preparation beyond an in-person classroom.
Reforming common testing
Changes to common testing
- 1979
Common First-Stage Achievement Test
- 1990
Center Test
- 2021
Common Test
- 2025
Informatics added, including Informatics I
Subjects and their use change with reform; required combinations still vary by institution and route.
Common university testing changed from the 1979 Common First-Stage Achievement Test to the 1990 Center Test and the Common Test in 2021. The 2025 test added Informatics, including Informatics I, reflecting the high-school curriculum. Names, subjects and admissions combinations change, so two generations in one family may have quite different experiences.
1979 to 1990: changing the use of common testing
1979
For national and public universities
Assess foundational high-school learning together
Aim to reduce difficult or unusual questions beyond the curriculum
1990
Private universities may also use it
Institutions choose subjects
Combine results with their own assessments
Shared test results still feed distinct institutional admissions decisions.
The Common First-Stage Test, introduced for national and public universities in 1979, sought to reduce difficult or unusual questions beyond the high-school curriculum and assess foundational learning together. From 1990 the Center Test could also be used by private universities, with institutions choosing subjects and combining results with their own assessments. Reform aimed at evaluation from more than one angle. A shared paper supplied scores for differing institutional decisions.
2021: applying learning in unfamiliar situations
Using historical evidence in the 2021 Common Test’s question-setting policy
- Relate the material to prior learning and a hypothesis
- Test the hypothesis against the evidence
The policy emphasises applying knowledge and reasoning, rather than turning every question into an essay.
The 2021 Common Test’s question-setting policy retained Center Test experience while making understanding, thinking, judgment and expression explicit. Questions could draw on classroom learning, everyday problems or analysis of evidence, asking candidates to apply knowledge to unfamiliar material. The history policy, for example, proposed relating unseen sources to classroom knowledge and testing hypotheses against evidence. Applying knowledge did not mean replacing every question with an essay.
What can you now explain?
Must every child compete for a municipal junior-high place?
No. Ordinary municipal entry follows school assignment. National, private and integrated schools have separate admissions decisions.
Do comprehensive or recommendation routes ignore academic achievement?
No. They can combine school records, interviews, Common Test results and other evidence, depending on the institution and route.
Does hensachi fifty mean fifty percent correct?
No. It corresponds to the mean score in that test’s candidate group, not a percentage mark.
Why do the ¥230,000 and ¥349,000 figures differ?
Both concern annual public junior-high juku expenditure in fiscal 2023. The first averages all pupils; the second includes only those with such expenditure.
Does meeting a Common Test condition mean admission is complete?
No. Osaka’s 2027 Science Challenge route also assesses documents, an essay examination and an oral examination. Meeting the Common Test condition is one part of that decision. Successful candidates must still complete enrolment.
Sources and further reading
- Wikipedia:入学試験(受験から転送)
- Wikipedia:Entrance examination
- 维基百科:入学考试
- Wikipedia:Education in Japan
- 文部科学省:中高一貫教育Q&A
- 神奈川県:公立高校入学者選抜制度の概要(2026年6月30日)
- 大阪大学:総合型選抜・学校推薦型選抜について
- 大学入試センター:大学入試センターのあゆみ
- 河合塾:模試活用法-偏差値・判定の基礎編
- 文部科学省:令和7年度子供の学習費調査の手引き(保護者用)
- 文部科学省:令和5年度子供の学習費調査 調査結果の概要(2026年1月訂正)
- 文部科学省 学制百年史:高等学校入学者の選抜
- 文部科学省 学制百年史:高等教育機関入学者の選抜
- 文部科学省:大学入学者選抜関連資料(2024年12月)
- 国立看護大学校:受験上の配慮申請について(2026年6月)
- 旺文社:旺文社の歩み
- 教学社:赤本オンライン よくある質問
- 大学入試センター:令和9年度共通テスト出願サイト はじめに
- 京都府立洛北高等学校:2025年共通テスト変更の全体像(2023年進路ニュース)
- 情報処理学会:2025年度共通テスト本試験「情報I」第3問の解説
- 東京都教育委員会:令和9年度東京都立中等教育学校及び東京都立中学校入学者決定に関する実施要綱・同細目について
- 令和9年度 総合型選抜・学校推薦型選抜 学生募集要項(理学部挑戦型25–26頁、出願5頁、合格・入学55–57頁)|大阪大学
- 令和9年度 出願の準備・手続日程|大阪大学
- 令和9年度 理学部挑戦型の注目ポイント|大阪大学
- 国立大学の入試改革・第2部2 大学入試センター試験の改善(2000年報告)|国立大学協会
- 学制百二十年史・大学入試センター試験への移行|文部科学省
- 令和3年度大学入学共通テスト問題作成方針(2020年6月30日一部変更)|大学入試センター