In 令和8年10月28日, Reiwa is followed by the year number, month and day. 元 in 令和元年 means the first year. Forms may abbreviate Meiji as M, Taishō as T, Shōwa as S, Heisei as H and Reiwa as R. The number must remain attached to its era: an isolated 8 is not a complete year.
IN 30 SECONDS
Japanese era names: reading a date such as Reiwa 8
元号
A Japanese era date combines an era name with a year number. Reiwa 8 corresponds to 2026. The system counts years; it does not determine the lengths of months. A new era begins with year one, conventionally written gannen.
令和8年
2026
Read the era name before the number
Gannen means the first year
Check the month and day in a transition year
Reading modern dates
The parts of a written date
Era name
Year 8
Month: October
Day: 28
令和元年 = Reiwa year 1
MMeiji
TTaishō
SShōwa
HHeisei
RReiwa
Letters are possible form abbreviations; follow the instructions of the particular form.
Converting a year
Modern era dates using the Gregorian calendar
Reiwa’s starting year
Era year
Year one is already counted
= 2026
This gives the year. Check the effective month and day in a transition year; pre-1873 lunisolar dates need a separate calendar conversion.
For modern era dates using the Gregorian calendar, add the era year minus one to the Gregorian year in which the era began. Reiwa 8 gives 2019 + 8 − 1 = 2026. Transition years require the effective month and day as well. Dates before the 1873 calendar reform need a separate calendar conversion; this formula alone cannot supply their complete Gregorian date.
Two era names within 2019
2019.01.01 — 04.30
Heisei 31
2019.05.01 — 12.31
Reiwa 1
2020.01.01
Reiwa 2 begins
1 May: change of era
The month does not return to January
1 January: advance the year
No wait for the era’s anniversary
January through 30 April 2019 belonged to Heisei 31; Reiwa 1 began on 1 May. The month did not restart at January. Modern era years advance on 1 January, not on the anniversary of the era’s start: Reiwa 1 ended on 31 December 2019, and Reiwa 2 began on 1 January 2020. The opening and closing years of Taishō, Shōwa and Heisei likewise require the precise transition date, not just a year-conversion table.
Early use and rival eras
From early adoption to continuous use
Taika
Early use, followed by gaps
Taihō
Continuous succession from here
“Heian period” is a period label containing many eras. Early use between Taika and Taihō was not uninterrupted.
The system originated in China. The Nihon shoki records Taika for 645, but early Japanese use had gaps. Continuous succession dates from Taihō in 701. An era name also differs from a historical period label: the Heian period, for example, contained many era names.
Why an emperor could have several eras
Before modern times, several changes could occur within one reign
Accession
Disasters
Auspicious events
Certain cyclical years
Do not project one reign, one era back onto ancient documents. Check month, day, cyclical date and issuing context.
Before modern times, accession, disasters, auspicious events and certain cyclical years could prompt a change. One emperor could therefore have several eras. The rival Northern and Southern Courts also used separate names. Historical documents need their political and calendrical context; today’s rule cannot simply be applied backwards.
Yōrō: an auspicious event in 717
717, within Empress Genshō’s reign
Reiki 3, ninth month
Visit to the spring in Mino
Eleventh month, same year
Edict interprets reports as auspicious and proclaims Yōrō
An edict’s interpretation ≠ medical proof
These are the contemporary lunisolar months, rather than Gregorian September and November. The spring’s identification remains disputed.
Empress Genshō visited a spring in Mino in the ninth month of Reiki 3 (717). An edict in the eleventh month treated reports of its healing powers as an auspicious sign and announced Yōrō as the new era. This explains the proclaimed reason for a change within her reign; it does not establish a medical effect. The spring’s precise identification remains disputed.
Two first years in 1375
Southern Court · Chōkei
Bunchū → Tenju 1
Northern Court · Go-En’yū
Ōan → Eiwa 1
The shared point is the starting Western year, not an identical start day or successive years. Preserve the original era name and check issuer, place, month and day.
The Southern Court’s Chōkei used Tenju, while the Northern Court’s Go-En’yū used Eiwa. Both eras began in 1375, replacing Bunchū and Ōan respectively. Different era names can therefore reflect rival courts rather than successive years. Preserve a document’s original dating and check its issuer, place, month and day before placing it on a shared timeline.
How modern rules took shape
One reign, one era
1868
Meiji: one reign, one era, with the year renamed retrospectively
1979
Era Name Act: set by cabinet order, changed upon succession
Meiji
Taishō
Shōwa
Heisei
Reiwa
1868 used the old calendar; its retrospective renaming differs from the Gregorian effective-date change in 2019.
Meiji’s proclamation in 1868 established one era per reign and retrospectively renamed that year Meiji 1. That historical change should not be read as though the new label applied only from a modern-style transition day. The 1979 Era Name Act provides for an era to be set by cabinet order and changed upon imperial succession. The modern sequence is Meiji, Taishō, Shōwa, Heisei and Reiwa.
Continued use before a new legal basis
1947
No era provision in the new Imperial House Law; Shōwa remains in use
1979
The Era Name Act supplies a new legal basis and cabinet-order mechanism
Continued use of a name and the legal mechanism for its successor are separate questions.
The postwar Imperial House Law of 1947 contained no provision for era names, yet Shōwa continued in public and private use. The Era Name Act of 1979 supplied a new legal basis, assigning the decision to cabinet order. Continued use of an existing name and the legal procedure for choosing its successor were separate matters.
From proposed names to cabinet order
The procedure supplied in 2019: established in 1979 and subsequently amended
Prime minister → experts
Commission names with meanings and sources
Chief cabinet secretary → prime minister
Screen and organise candidates, then report
PM’s instructions; secretary consults law bureau
Consult its director-general and select a few options
Secretary → outside advisers → prime minister
Gather views and report back
Prime minister → both Houses’ presiding officers
Consult speakers and vice-speakers of both Houses
All ministers discuss → cabinet decides
Discuss the options; decide the era-changing order
Screening criteria in the procedure
Two kanji, easy reading and writing, no previous use as an era or posthumous name, and other criteria. These are separate from the Act’s text.
The selection procedure is separate from the Era Name Act. The version supplied to the 2019 meeting dates from 1979, with later amendments. The prime minister commissions experts to propose names with meanings and sources. The chief cabinet secretary screens them and reports to the prime minister, then, on the prime minister’s instructions, consults the director-general of the Cabinet Legislation Bureau to select a few options. The secretary gathers outside advisers’ views and reports back. The prime minister then consults the speakers and vice-speakers of both parliamentary houses. All ministers discuss the options before the cabinet decides the order. Criteria such as two kanji, ease of reading and writing, and no prior use as an era or posthumous name belong to this procedure, not to the Act itself.
A literary source and a later start date
1 April 2019
Reiwa announced
1 May 2019
The order takes effect
Therefore: 15 April is still Heisei 31
The government identifies an early-spring passage in the Man’yōshū as the source. The image retains the red and grey markings in the bureau’s version.
View the bureau’s complete source image
Scroll the original image horizontally to read the vertical text.
The government identified a passage in the Man’yōshū describing early spring, the air and the wind as Reiwa’s source. The name was announced on 1 April 2019, but the order took effect on 1 May. Knowing the new name did not make it the current date label: a date in mid-April still belonged to Heisei 31.
Era dates in documents
Era counting and the calendar
Era-year conversion
Name + year number → corresponding Western year
Calendar conversion
Lunisolar month and day → separate conversion of the full date
Changing the year does not convert the lunisolar month and day. Era names can also be used with Gregorian dates.
Era dates continued after Japan adopted the Gregorian calendar. In an older document, changing an era year into a Western year does not also convert a lunisolar month and day. Computer systems likewise need support for new era names: displaying a new label and correctly interpreting a date are separate tasks.
Why old forms could remain usable
Central ministries’ 2019 administrative transition policy
Documents made before the change
Later dates still labelled Heisei do not automatically invalidate them
Applications on forms with old labels
May be accepted, with corrections or notes where needed
This does not establish one identical rule for all private documents.
Central ministries’ 2019 transition policy kept earlier documents valid even when Heisei was used for dates after the change. Applications on forms retaining the old label could also be accepted, with corrections or explanatory notes where needed. This was an administrative transition policy; it should not be treated as a universal rule for every private document.
What can you now explain?
Does Reiwa 1 cover all of 2019?
No. It starts on 1 May; the preceding dates belong to Heisei 31.
Does an era name determine month length?
No. It counts years; the calendar determines months and days.
Did each emperor always have one era?
No. That modern principle dates to 1868; earlier reigns could contain several era names.
Which era applies to 15 April 2019?
Heisei 31. Reiwa had been announced on 1 April but did not take effect until 1 May.
Must Tenju 1 and Eiwa 1 be consecutive years?
No. Both began in 1375 under rival courts. Exact dates still require the original month, day and documentary context.
Does the Yōrō proclamation prove that a spring cured illness?
No. It records the auspicious interpretation used to justify an era change, not a modern medical finding.